Flint

Flint Inc.

Round 2

At a glance

Administrative details

Application type

Web + iOS / Android

MFA / SSO

Supported

Schools using

Group pricing

Not available

Pricing tier

Tier 2 ($1–10k)

User type

Staff only

Account manager

Sam Okonkwo

Customer success

Flint Inc. Customer Success

Illustrative admin fields — real values load from contracts / vendor records in production.

Round 1 · Privacy Triage

Insufficient Evidence — Round 2 required

Privacy score 77.1% · band Good · addresses 14 of 18

3 mandatory gates are unaddressed in the privacy policy (Q1 (Data Collection); Q5 (Data Sharing); Q11 (Data Safety)) — more than we tolerate at triage. No violation found, but silence can't earn a pass; escalate these specific items to Round 2. Scope note: 1 question(s) in the current rubric were not assessed in this run — Q19 (Data Security). The evidence predates them, so they are excluded from the 77.1% rather than scored as silence. Re-run the extractor to close the gap.

Waive a finding that doesn't apply to your school (e.g. a feature you don't enable). Re-scores instantly; recorded as a cited footnote.)

Q1 · Data Collection — Does the vendor limit collection/use of information to only data required for the product? answer: unclearQ5 · Data Sharing — Does the vendor limit data sharing with third parties to the purpose for which it was collected? answer: unclearQ11 · Data Safety — Can students contact or interact with UNKNOWN users (strangers / the general public) in environments NOT supervised by a teacher or school? (Teacher-managed or within-class interaction, and content-only sharing, do NOT count.) answer: unclear

Re-vet from the live policy (re-reads the vendor's published policy set now — privacy policy plus the security, sub-processor and terms pages it links to — and re-runs Round 1. The current verdict stays until the new one lands; a partial or blocked page never replaces it.)

View full cited report ↗

Round 2 · Vendor-supplied documents

What the vendor sent you — a data-processing agreement, a completed security questionnaire, a SOC 2 or ISO summary, a contract. Stored with this record. Every re-vet and every Drift Sentinel scan reads these first, ahead of the public pages, and quotes from them carry evidence tier T2 (contractual) instead of T3 (public claim).

No vendor documents on file. Round 1 reads the public policy set only.

Add a document (PDF, DOCX, TXT or MD, up to 25 MB — or paste the text). It re-vets the vendor as soon as it is stored.

…or paste the document text

Demo: — labelled as a sample, not from the vendor.

Safeguarding summary

Round 1 found no explicit safeguarding violations; data-collection limits, third-party sharing scope and student-interaction controls are not addressed in the public policy — confirm via Round 2 (DPA + security documentation).

Newly catalogued — VettED Round 1 run on the vendor's live privacy policy (2026-07-13): no gate violations, three gates unaddressed → Round 2 documentation requested before full approval.