VettEDApplication Library Working prototype · V1
← Back to catalog

Nearpod

Nearpod (Renaissance)
Round 2
Vendor URL unverified. Best guess — standard /privacy path; Nearpod was acquired by Renaissance in 2021 and the trust page location may have shifted. Verify before VettED run.

At a glance

Category
Quiz & Assessment
Subject
Cross-curricular
Age range
Ages 6–18 / KS1–KS5
Status
Round 2
Used by
Harbor View School, Northside Academy, Riverside Preparatory School
Licences / seats
Tracked at intake
Vendor trust page

An interactive lesson platform that lets teachers deliver real-time formative assessments, virtual reality experiences, and collaborative activities within structured lessons.

Category (override):

Administrative details

Application type
Web + iOS / Android
MFA / SSO
Not supported
Schools using
3
Group pricing
Not available
Pricing tier
Tier 3 (>$10k)
User type
Students & Staff
Account manager
Sam Okonkwo
Customer success
Nearpod (Renaissance) Customer Success

Illustrative admin fields — real values load from contracts / vendor records in production.

Round 1 · Privacy Triage

Insufficient — Request Data-Processing Agreement
📄 Looks like a website privacy policy, not a data-processing agreement. This reads as a general website privacy policy, not a data-processing agreement: 13 of 18 questions are simply not addressed. That's a wrong-document signal, not a vendor judgment — the 100.0% reflects silence, not bad practice. Enterprise vendors' real assurance lives in their DPA, a security cert (e.g. ISO 27001), or a completed questionnaire. Request those and assess in Round 2. Coverage note: the policy addresses 5 of 18 questions (28%); a vendor cannot reach the Best band below 70% coverage. Scope note: 1 question(s) in the current rubric were not assessed in this run — Q19 (Data Security). The evidence predates them, so they are excluded from the 100.0% rather than scored as silence. Re-run the extractor to close the gap.
Addresses only 5 of 5 of the student-data checklist — the score reflects silence, not the vendor's posture. Request the DPA + ISO 27001 and assess in Round 2 (deep review).
Re-vet from the live policy (re-reads the vendor's published policy set now — privacy policy plus the security, sub-processor and terms pages it links to — and re-runs Round 1. The current verdict stays until the new one lands; a partial or blocked page never replaces it.)
View full cited report ↗

Round 2 · Vendor-supplied documents

What the vendor sent you — a data-processing agreement, a completed security questionnaire, a SOC 2 or ISO summary, a contract. Stored with this record. Every re-vet and every Drift Sentinel scan reads these first, ahead of the public pages, and quotes from them carry evidence tier T2 (contractual) instead of T3 (public claim).

No vendor documents on file. Round 1 reads the public policy set only.
Add a document (PDF, DOCX, TXT or MD, up to 25 MB — or paste the text). It re-vets the vendor as soon as it is stored.
…or paste the document text
Demo: — labelled as a sample, not from the vendor.

Safeguarding summary

Vendor trust page could not be auto-fetched; queued for review.

Vetting queued — automated review pending.