VettEDApplication Library Working prototype · V1
← Back to catalog

Padlet

Wallwisher Inc.
Approved
Vendor URL unverified. Best guess — standard /privacy path on padlet.com. Padlet is operated by Wallwisher Inc.; the privacy page location is plausible but should be verified before VettED run as the URL may have changed.

At a glance

Category
Communication & Collaboration
Subject
Cross-curricular
Age range
Ages 8–18 / KS2–KS5
Status
Approved
Used by
Harbor View School, Northside Academy, Riverside Preparatory School
Licences / seats
Tracked at intake
Vendor trust page

A web-based collaborative board tool that allows teachers and students to post text, images, links, and multimedia content to shared digital notice boards, used across subjects for brainstorming, discussion, and resource sharing.

Category (override):

Administrative details

Application type
Web + iOS
MFA / SSO
Supported
Schools using
3
Group pricing
Available
Pricing tier
Tier 3 (>$10k)
User type
Staff & Families
Account manager
Priya Nair
Customer success
Wallwisher Inc. Customer Success

Illustrative admin fields — real values load from contracts / vendor records in production.

Round 1 · Privacy Triage

Approved
Privacy score 95.0% · band Best · addresses 16 of 18

All 9 mandatory gates clean; privacy score 95.0% (Best). Confident to use on the strength of the public privacy policy — Round 2 not required. Scope note: 1 question(s) in the current rubric were not assessed in this run — Q19 (Data Security). The evidence predates them, so they are excluded from the 95.0% rather than scored as silence. Re-run the extractor to close the gap.

No blocking findings left to waive — the verdict stands on the evidence.
Re-vet from the live policy (re-reads the vendor's published policy set now — privacy policy plus the security, sub-processor and terms pages it links to — and re-runs Round 1. The current verdict stays until the new one lands; a partial or blocked page never replaces it.)
View full cited report ↗

Round 2 · Vendor-supplied documents

What the vendor sent you — a data-processing agreement, a completed security questionnaire, a SOC 2 or ISO summary, a contract. Stored with this record. Every re-vet and every Drift Sentinel scan reads these first, ahead of the public pages, and quotes from them carry evidence tier T2 (contractual) instead of T3 (public claim).

No vendor documents on file. Round 1 reads the public policy set only.
Add a document (PDF, DOCX, TXT or MD, up to 25 MB — or paste the text). It re-vets the vendor as soon as it is stored.
…or paste the document text
Demo: — labelled as a sample, not from the vendor.

Safeguarding summary

Advisory: Insufficient Evidence — Round 2 Required. No security risks were identified, but the reviewed source(s) don't document enough to clear this vendor: 4 domain(s) have no evidence and the rest are self-asserted (unverified). This is NOT a finding that the vendor is risky — it means we can't yet confirm they're safe. Request the documents below (SOC 2 / ISO 27001 / DPA / completed questionnaire), then re-assess.

Low apparent risk but thinly evidenced — pilot pending Round 2.